It fully simulates jury trials, evidentiary hearings, cross examinations, depositions, judge rulings, jury deliberations, even individual juror sentiment. It displays all the human dynamics including motivations, thoughts, actions, words, and written artifacts just as you were in the courtroom, while giving the user full control to change any element and see what are the changes in the probable outcomes.
It uses Large Language Model or Generative AI technology under the hood to create detailed simulations beyond the traditional data science, database store and statistical modeling methods.
It allows the user to modify all the elements or try different strategies and see how this effects the outcomes.
Currently it is in the Beta testing stage. If you are interested to contribute as testers for the Beta please contact Court-Sim at Court.Simulator@gmail.com.
It is released already as Beta and being used, however the official target release date is in September 2025.
At Court-Sim, accuracy, transparency, and ethical use of AI are core principles. We take the following measures:
Grounding in Verifiable Sources
All simulations that reference case law, statutes, or evidence are grounded in public dockets, authenticated case materials, or user-provided documents. Whenever possible, we include citations or document IDs so attorneys can review the exact source.
Clear Confidence Indicators
Our platform surfaces confidence bands for factual retrievals and outcome predictions, so users know when a statement is based on strong precedent versus low-confidence reasoning.
Role-Playing Transparency
AI personas (judges, jurors, attorneys, witnesses) are clearly labeled as simulations. They do not represent real individuals unless you specifically provide anonymized, authorized profiles for training purposes. Any likeness to real persons is coincidental unless based on public-domain trial records.
Redaction and Privacy
All client-provided materials are stored securely and, during beta, are redacted in our internal evaluation datasets. We will never use confidential case materials to train models without explicit written consent.
Human-in-the-Loop Review
Court-Sim is an augmentation tool, not a replacement for professional judgment. We recommend that attorneys verify all simulation outputs before relying on them in strategy or court. The tool is designed to surface possibilities and highlight weaknesses, not to dictate decisions.
Ethical Boundaries
We follow applicable rules of professional conduct and avoid generating content that could mislead clients, juries, or the public. Simulations are meant for internal strategic use, not public dissemination as factual accounts.
Court-Sim aims to be transparent about its data, clear about its limitations, and unwavering in protecting client confidentiality. Our goal is to help legal teams prepare better—not replace the expertise, judgment, and responsibility of licensed attorneys.